The UN war crimes tribunal has determined that the late Serbian president was not responsible for war crimes committed in Bosnia during the 1992-95 war. The judges determined that Slobodan Milosevic was not part of a "joint criminal enterprise" to victimize Bosnian Muslims and Croats.
Written By: Andy Wilcoxson
18 July 2016 - www.slobodan-milosevic.org
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague
has determined that the late Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic was not
responsible for war crimes committed during the 1992-95 Bosnian war.
In a stunning ruling, the trial chamber that convicted former Bosnian-Serb president Radovan Karadzic of war crimes and sentenced him to 40 years in prison, unanimously concluded that Slobodan Milosevic was not part of a “joint criminal enterprise” to victimize Muslims and Croats during the Bosnian war.
The March 24th Karadzic judgment states that “the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milosevic agreed with the common plan” to permanently remove Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats from Bosnian Serb claimed territory.
The Karadzic trial chamber found that “the relationship between Milosevic and the Accused had deteriorated beginning in 1992; by 1994, they no longer agreed on a course of action to be taken. Furthermore, beginning as early as March 1992, there was apparent discord between the Accused and Milosevic in meetings with international representatives, during which Milosevic and other Serbian leaders openly criticised Bosnian Serb leaders of committing ‘crimes against humanity’ and ‘ethnic cleansing’ and the war for their own purposes.”
judges noted that Slobodan Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic both favored the
preservation of Yugoslavia and that Milosevic was initially supportive, but
that their views diverged over time. The judgment states that “from 1990 and
into mid-1991, the political objective of the Accused and the Bosnian Serb
leadership was to preserve Yugoslavia and to prevent the separation or
independence of BiH, which would result in a separation of Bosnian Serbs from
Serbia; the Chamber notes that Slobodan Milosevic endorsed this objective and
spoke against the independence of BiH.”
The Chamber found that “the declaration of sovereignty by the SRBiH Assembly in the absence of the Bosnian Serb delegates on 15 October 1991, escalated the situation,” but that Milosevic was not on board with the establishment of Republika Srpska in response. The judgment says that “Slobodan Milosevic was attempting to take a more cautious approach”
The judgment states that in intercepted communications with Radovan Karadzic, “Milosevic questioned whether it was wise to use ‘an illegitimate act in response to another illegitimate act’ and questioned the legality of forming a Bosnian Serb Assembly.” The judges also found that “Slobodan Milosevic expressed his reservations about how a Bosnian Serb Assembly could exclude the Muslims who were ‘for Yugoslavia’.”
The judgment notes that in meetings with Serb and Bosnian Serb officials “Slobodan Milosevic stated that ‘[a]ll members of other nations and ethnicities must be protected’ and that ‘[t]he national interest of the Serbs is not discrimination’.” Also that “Milosevic further declared that crime needed to be fought decisively.”
The trial chamber notes that “In private meetings, Milosevic was extremely angry at the Bosnian Serb leadership for rejecting the Vance-Owen Plan and he cursed the Accused.” They also found that “Milosevic tried to reason with the Bosnian Serbs saying that he understood their concerns, but that it was most important to end the war.”
The judgment states that “Milosevic also questioned whether the world would accept that the Bosnian Serbs who represented only one third of the population of BiH would get more than 50% of the territory and he encouraged a political agreement.”
At a meeting of the Supreme Defense Council the judgment says that “Milosevic told the Bosnian Serb leadership that they were not entitled to have more than half the territory in BiH, stating that: ‘there is no way that more than that could belong to us! Because, we represent one third of the population. […] We are not entitled to in excess of half of the territory – you must not snatch away something that belongs to someone else! […] How can you imagine two thirds of the population being crammed into 30% of the territory, while 50% is too little for you?! Is it humane, is it fair?!’”
In other meetings with Serb and Bosnian Serb officials, the judgment notes that Milosevic “declared that the war must end and that the Bosnian Serbs’ biggest mistake was to want a complete defeat of the Bosnian Muslims.” Because of the rift between Milosevic and the Bosnian-Serbs, the judges note that “the FRY reduced its support for the RS and encouraged the Bosnian Serbs to accept peace proposals.”
Tribunal’s determination that Slobodan Milosevic was not part of a joint
criminal enterprise, and that on the contrary he “condemned ethnic cleansing” is of tremendous significance
because he got blamed for all of the bloodshed in Bosnia, and harsh economic
sanctions were imposed on Serbia as a result. Wrongfully accusing Milosevic
ranks right up there with invading Iraq only to find that there weren’t any
weapons of mass destruction after all.
Slobodan Milosevic was vilified by the entire western press corps and virtually every politician in every NATO country. They called him “the Butcher of the Balkans.” They compared him to Hitler and accused him of genocide. They demonized him and made him out to be a bloodthirsty monster, and they used that false image to justify not only economic sanctions against Serbia, but also the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia and the Kosovo war.
Slobodan Milosevic had to spend the last five years of his life in prison defending himself and Serbia from bogus war crimes allegations over a war that they now admit he was trying to stop. The most serious charges that Milosevic faced, including the charge of genocide, were all in relation to Bosnia. Now, ten years after his death, they admit that he wasn’t guilty after all – oops.
The ICTY did nothing to publicize the fact that they had cleared Milosevic of involvement in the joint criminal enterprise. They quietly buried that finding 1,303 pages into the 2,590 page Karadzic verdict knowing full well that most people would probably never bother to read it.
presiding judge in the Radovan Karadzic trial, O-Gon Kwon of South Korea, was
also one of the judges in the Slobodan Milosevic trial. Milosevic’s exoneration
by the Karadzic trial chamber may be an indication of how the Milosevic chamber
would have eventually ruled, at least on the Bosnia charges, if Milosevic had lived
to see the conclusion of his own trial.
It’s worth recalling that Slobodan Milosevic died under a very suspicious set of circumstances. He died of a heart attack just two weeks after the Tribunal denied his request to undergo heart surgery in Russia. He was found dead in his cell less than 72 hours after his attorney delivered a letter to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in which he said that he feared he was being poisoned.
The Tribunal’s official report on the inquiry into his death confirmed that, “Rifampicin had been found in a blood sample taken from Mr. Milosevic on 12 January 2006.” And that “Mr. Milosevic was not told of the results until 3 March 2006 because of the difficult legal position in which Dr. Falke (the Tribunal’s chief medical officer) found himself by virtue of the Dutch legal provisions concerning medical confidentiality.”
The presence of Rifamicin (a non-prescribed drug) in Milosevic’s blood would
have counteracted the high blood pressure medication he was taking and
increased his risk of the heart attack that ultimately did kill him. The
Tribunal’s admission that they knew about the Rifampicin for months, but didn’t
tell Milosevic the results of his own blood test until just days before his
death because of “Dutch legal provisions concerning medical confidentiality” is
an incredibly lame and disingenuous excuse. There is no provision of Dutch law
that prohibits a doctor from telling the patient the results of his own blood test
-- that would be idiotic. On the contrary, concealing such information from the
patient could be seen as malpractice.
This all gives rise to well-founded suspicion that powerful geopolitical interests would rather Milosevic die before the end of his trial than see him acquitted and have their vicious lies exposed. U.S. State Department cables leaked to Wikileaks confirm that The Tribunal did discuss Milosevic’s medical condition and his medical records with U.S. Embassy personnel in The Hague without his consent. They clearly didn’t care about medical confidentiality laws when they were blabbing about his medical records to the American embassy.
It’s an unsatisfying outcome that Milosevic has been quietly vindicated for the most serious crimes that he was accused of some ten years after his death. At a minimum financial compensation should now be paid to his widow and his children, and reparations should be paid to Serbia by the western governments who sought to punish Serbia in order to hold Milosevic “accountable” for crimes that their own Tribunal now admits he wasn’t responsible for, and was in fact trying to stop.
 ICTY, Karadzic Judgment,
24 March 2016, Para. 3460
< http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/tjug/en/160324_judgement.pdf >
 Ibid., Footnote 11027
 Ibid., Para. 3276
 Ibid., Para. 2709
 Ibid., Para. 2710
 Ibid., Para. 2685
 Ibid., Para. 2687
 Ibid., Para. 3288
 Ibid., Para. 3284
 Ibid., Para. 3289
 Ibid., Para. 3295
 Ibid., Para. 3290
 Ibid., Para. 3297
 Ibid., Para. 3293
 Ibid., Para. 3292
 Ibid., Para. 3280
 ICTY Case No. IT-02-54 Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milosevic, Decision on Assigned Counsel Request for Provisional Release, February 23, 2006
 Text of Slobodan
Milosevic’s Letter to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
< http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/sm030806.htm >
 Judge Kevin Parker
(Vice-President of the ICTY), Report to the President of the ICTY: Death of
Slobodan Milosevic, May 2006; ¶ 31, 76
< http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/custom2/en/parkerreport.pdf >
 U.S. State Dept. Cable
#03THEHAGUE2835_a, “ICTY: An Inside Look Into Milosevic’s Health and Support
< https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/03THEHAGUE2835_a.html >